On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:45:02AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > In my opinion, that is the point: NeuroDebian does not look any > different to me than f.e. DebiChem or Debian Astro, or DebianMed. It has > some interesting developments however (the extensive backports solution, > f.e.)
BTW, the whole Blends framework was assembled by picking interesting solutions from different user oriented groups and make them generally available for all other user oriented ... and finally found a common name for these. Following these idea you can turn NeuroDebian into a Blend by implementing their features into the Blends framework (since you can not convince them to do this themselves ;-) ). > Therefore I don't see a reason why it is not listed on > <https://www.debian.org/blends>. I would consider it apropriate to list NeuroDebian there but finally the initiative should come from the people behind NeuroDebian. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
