On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:04:19AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > If the complaint warrants a ban or warning, the opinions of other > listmasters is canvassed for a short period of time, and if there are no > objections, the action proceeds. If anything more than a warning occurs, it > is announced on debian-private@, which enables Debian Developers to review > the actions that listmaster@ has taken, and override them via GR.
Alright. Thank you. I would like to see some public process for review machinery, and I'd like to see a requirement that rather than "no objections" there be a quorum for a banning decision, but that these actions are recorded in debian-private seems sufficient. > Mailing list bans are not done in public to avoid harming the reputation > of the individuals banned. If the individual in question wants the ban > to be disclosed publicly, they can email listmaster@, and we will do so. I'll pass this along. It seems reasonable. Thanks. -- Mason Loring Bliss ma...@blisses.org Ewige Blumenkraft! (if awake 'sleep (aref #(sleep dream) (random 2))) -- Hamlet, Act III, Scene I -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140905173029.gx3...@blisses.org
