On 31/08/14 09:35, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 08:40:16AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> What I'm really getting at is how do we explain it concisely to new people >> and boost recognition of genuine free software. I didn't say "ban this or >> ban that", I was just pointing out that many people are using their own >> definition of open source. > > So, to that end, are there any examples of folks calling something "open > source" and that thing using something other than an OSI-approved license? I
See the example in my original email. The license in question (the Crockford license[1]) is one of many licenses that are not OSI approved. 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Crockford#.22Good.2C_not_Evil.22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5402db10.4070...@pocock.pro
