Hi, On Montag, 3. März 2014, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > It's a false dichtonomy, we could say that GNOME doesn't work on those > platforms. That'd be sad, but it wouldn't make those platforms > unusable, nor would it make GNOME generally unusable. > > It wouldn't be the first or the last time we don't have feature parity > between ports.
that, plus it's s/GNOME/GNOME, KDE and Xfce4/g (yawning!) and yes, I think we
should rather keep those desktops instead of the toy ports or those
toy/historic init systems. _if_ that question ever pops up like this for real
and not just in doomsday threads.
cheers,
Holger
P.S.: I pretty much used to dislike the term toy ports. This init system saga
has made me change my language, not sure yet, if also constantly my mind. I
also don't think I really like the change in language, but meh.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
