On Feb 27, Yves-Alexis Perez <cor...@debian.org> wrote: > > Because unless you are paranoid, then it is not. > > If anybody disagrees then please describe a credible threat model in > > which: > > - an entity would want to have access to the key of a DD, and > > - would find brute forcing a 1024 bit key more practical than > > stealing it or coercing a developer to disclose it. > > There's also the hash algorithm issue, which could lead to signature > collision attacks (wether in data signing or in key signing). Please describe a credible threat model, etc. "Theoretically possible" also means that somebody could factor a RSA 4096 key at the first try with pen and paper so it does not matter much.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
