Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> (2014-01-03): > I think that the current policy maintenance approach is too > bureaucratic and relies too little on the technical judgement of the > policy editors. I would like to see the policy editors assess > proposals not only for consensus and support, but also to consider > proposals on their actual merit. Support (in the form of seconds) and > consensus can be a very helpful guide to the merit of a proposal, and > seeking consensus and second opinions is a very helpful way to avoid > making mistakes, but IMO it is the merit of the proposal that should > matter.
Have you seen some mistakes that would help us (or at least me)
understand which problems you're {thinking of,anticipating}?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
