On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:46:38PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Dear FTP team, > > I found #675435 where it was written that CC-BY-SA-2.0 was not suitable > for Debian, and now I am confused. > > Could you let us know your position on the possiblity to accept CC-BY-SA-2.0 > by > upgrading it to 3.0 through its clause 4b ?
I missed this thread until I stumbled on a bug. 4b applies to derivative works only. Underscores mine. / | You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly | digitally perform a ____Derivative Work____ only under the terms of this | License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements | as this License, or a Creative Commons Commons license that contains | the same License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike | 2.0 Japan). \ .. (etc) ... As such, no. This has resulted in a few REJECTs. Folks who have uploaded 2.0 as 3.0, don't keep doing it. If it made it through NEW for some crazy reason, please file a serious bug on your package and CC the ftpteam. Have a nice weekend, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
