On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:41:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I wonder if the contact address shouldn't be something less tied to > > project individuals, like for instance debian-project@lists.d.o. Given > > there is already a separation between this and the author field > > (allowing to give proper credit to who worked on the application), I > > think it'd be better to have as contact point some "role address" of > > sort. What do you think? > > Hi Stefano and debian-policy@lists.d.o subscribers, > > I was wondering about the same, but I was worried that having a > broad-readership mailing list as a contact point would create confusion about > who is expected to answer. How about debian-policy@lists.d.o ? It is anyway > the contact point for the specification itself.
Hi again Charles, in fact the above is a typo of mine :-). debian-*policy*@lists.d.o is in fact what I wanted to propose. Sorry for the confusion. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
