On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 08:42:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Francesca Ciceri <madame...@debian.org> writes: > > > ** changes proposed for (1): > > - s/religions/religious belief or disbelief/ (dkg) > > It's foolish to commit to respect all opinions. Some opinions (some > political or religious beliefs, for example) are not worthy of respect, > and some are indeed destructive of a welcoming environment. > > We should respect a person's right to *hold* whatever opinions they > like; but those opinions, when expressed, should get no assumed > protection, not even in a diversity statement. If the opinion is unsound > or hateful or otherwise unworthy of respect, it should get no protection > in a public forum.
Yeah, I see your argument. And is a valid one, IMO.
I think that Russ reply [1] to a similar concern express by Gregor
fits also your argument: we welcome people who are ok with the diversity
statement, so no hateful ideology/religion/whatever can be part of it, as
it doesn't comply with the diversity statement itself.
It's kinda like a short circuit: diversity statement accept everyone who
accept the diversity statement, and if your {opinion|ideology|religion}
doesn't comply with it you'll don't want - in the first place - to be
part of a project based on diversity.
It sound solid to me, but we can make it more explicit probably.
> We should not commit to respecting opinions, but instead commit to
> respecting all people.
How do you suggest to express it in the statement?
Cheers,
Francesca
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/03/msg00058.html
--
"Nostra patria è il mondo intero
e nostra legge è la libertà
ed un pensiero
ribelle in cor ci sta." P.Gori
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
