On Wed, March 21, 2012 13:16, Clint Adams wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:07:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> So I would advise to only make an effort to 'clean up' groups that have >> sufficiently 'dangerous' consequences attached to them. > > Then logically it would follow that the ones that don't should be > gid 800 instead.
In some situations I'm talking about there was a slight advantage that upon ingress you could verify that prospective committers were aware of basic procedure. But this is indeed only a minor advantage and a case for gid 800 (or equivalent solutions) could certainly be made for anything that's easily reversible; and we can expect DD's not to go on a commit rampage that takes a lot of time to revert. The collab-maint repository has been available to all DD's for a long while. We've been trying to get the secure-testing repository writable for all DD's, unfortunately the Alioth admins didn't have time to respond to that request yet, but the wish is certainly there. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b34ca52824cf986d67e3cec47587bdf3.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
