On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:08:25PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > I have no objection to this for 1.0, provided we at the same time clarify > that if more than one exception is in use, you need to use a custom > shortname instead of an ORed or ANDed list of licenses. > > Is there a consensus for this position? FWIW I think it's a sensible solution to it. The cases where there is more than one exception are probably quite rare and are effectively their own license in any case.
- Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org old fingerprint: 1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 NEW fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
