On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 05:28:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Has the project received competent legal advice stating that a package name > would be interpreted as infringing a trademark, and that we might have to > rename it?
I haven't sought such advice myself, nor I'm aware of any such advice sought in the past. If someone is (e.g. past DPL, -legal people, etc.), please speak up. Similarly, we could use hearing back from several advices sought by other (binary) distributions, as the problem is pretty much the same across distributions. Does anyone know about similar advices sought by other distributions, be them Debian derivatives or not? I can seek such advice via SPI lawyers if needed, but our share of their pipe is quite full already. Therefore I'd prefer reuse existing knowledge if it is available. > Note that I am not talking about violating the terms of a trademark > *license* here, which I maintain we generally have no reason to seek > (or accept), but about whether such use infringes actual trademark > rights directly. Whether the license part is relevant or not depends on the extent of fair use that can be granted to Debian packaging. For instance, I've little doubts that distributing unmodified upstream code would constitute fair use and hence grant us to reuse upstream marks in both package names and in the application itself. But when you start changing the code --- either in functional or non-functional ways --- the point that you're outside trademark fair use can be made. If that is the case, then we need to be concerned with trademark licenses, even if they are implicitly granted for the purposes of Debian activities on the upstream software. In fact, I fear this is the most common case we need to be concerned with. (I'm hand-waiving a bit here, as I surely cannot claim to be a trademark law expert. Insights from people who can claim more knowledge than me on these subjects are highly welcome.) Are you saying that, in your opinion, we have no reasons to seek trademark licenses for stuff distributed as part of Debian, even when it is modified wrt upstream? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o . Maître de conférences ...... http://upsilon.cc/zack ...... . . o Debian Project Leader ....... @zack on identi.ca ....... o o o « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature