On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05:57PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote: >On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:25:25PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: >> We have carried a major.minor scheme as a release numbering scheme >> since the Early Days, >[..] >> So, for the past years we have had x.0.y with growing `y' for point >> releases, and skiping to (x+1).0.0. And the zero in the middle carries >> no meaning anymore. > >On a related note, if we want dots, sub versions to be meaninful, using >them in the ISO name scheme as well may help. > >Many people downloaded Debian 505 recently. > >See #506489.
That's not the bug you're thinking of, surely? But yes, I agree - I'm happy to rename the CDs to include the dots in the version number. AFAIK the only reason not to do that previously was a scare story about broken filename handling in old versions of Windows. Not something I care about any more... Code change is in debian-cd svn as of ~2 minutes ago... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com < liw> everything I know about UK hotels I learned from "Fawlty Towers" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100914202327.gc18...@einval.com
