Lars Wirzenius writes: > On pe, 2010-08-20 at 14:55 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Now, I've no idea if the above would be appropriate for the upstream > > front desk or not. I leave it up to you to decide whether it's worth > > trying or not. > > I think a [email protected] mailing list, open to > everyone and archived publically, would be best. An alias > [email protected] could point to it, but I have no opinion on that. > > Anyone opposed to the mailing list? Shall I go and request one?
I just wonder what this list would be meant to serves which can't be deemed suitable for -mentors. Many upstreams (regardless they have any preliminary packages of their software or not) already use -mentors for entering Debian one way or another. It might be that too much separation might accidently introduce some confusion amongst the targeted consumers. I'm not opposing to a yet another mailing list per se, so please decipher that more like a question, rather than objection. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
