Le Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:03:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:30:06PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I use the Contact field instead of the Maintainer field for my packages, and > > nobody commented about, and they passed through the NEW queue. > > > I therefore think, in my humble opinion, that the attached patch is > > consensual > > and could be applied. > > This is a wholly specious argument. The ftp masters have stated previously > that they have no interest in DEP-5, and even if they did, a failure to > follow the spec would be no reason to reject a package from NEW. This only > demonstrates a consensus of one.
Give me a break, please. Lars proposed later: 1) Comment field 2) Upstream-Maintainer field 3) No field. Nobody supported 1). I answered that I support 3). You are beating a dead horse. -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
