On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:08:07 +1000, Craig Small wrote: > > You're not required to use it. If you want to improve the format, please > > make concrete proposals, or at least explain why it is complicated and > I actually second Bernd's comments. It seems uneccessarily complex and > so very much harder to read.
FWIW: I find it much easier to read than some free-form prose where I have to hunt down the relevant bits. IMO the main advantage is actually that it's human-readable. (Which doesn't mean it can't be improved or simplified.) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #78: Yes, yes, its called a design limitation
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
