On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 08:44:17PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: > Maintainers are the ones that know best their software, they are > encouraged to maintain their packages in best manner following a > strict policy and following strict verification and validation > procedures. In Debian, it is requested to have that software built in > all arches (or at least as much as you can get). Porters are there to > help out, but you can not put all the amount of work for all the > failing software on an architecture to the porters for such > architecture.
I'd like the people in the buildd-admins-are-doing-the-right-thing camp to describe the ideal workflow for solving architecture-specific issues with the ksh[0] package. [0] https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=ksh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
