On 2010-07-12, Clint Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:24:19PM +0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> I think it should be. Or the porters should monitor the builds on their >> architecture to be able to detect FTBFS and act on them, without the >> maintainer having to manually ping them. > > If I were a porter, I would not bother doing this if the buildd admin > did not care as much as a porter would; such inattention or apathy is > very frustrating and makes one want to cease being a porter.
I do think that buildd admins that doesn't care for the architechture they are buildd maintaining for should try hard handing over that responsibility to someone who does care for the arch. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
