Clint Adams <sch...@debian.org> writes: > [Adding and M-F-T-ing -project] > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:04:58AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> I want to point out that Luk's mail was not in any way discussed in the >> release team. I think it is horrible. >> >> I welcome everyone to critize the release team. I would prefer help, of >> course, but on the other hand, I do understand that people can see a >> problem, but don't have the time to fix. It would be nice if such >> criticism would be sent directly to the release team, and bluntly >> point out what the problem is, as that makes it easier to work on the >> issue. > > Okay, so when there is a mysterious release team meeting in Cambridge, > and there is no discussion or planning of it on debian-release, or > #debian-release, or anywhere else public that I can see, and there is > zero evidence that it was planned or happened on official channels, > and at least two of the participants (or whom I assume were participants) > tell me that transparency is either completely unimportant or > low-priority, and the DPL-2IC team seems to favor the opposite of > transparency, how is one supposed to know about this meeting in > time to complain about it? How and why should one complain to the > release team directly? > > Were you there? Were Debian funds spend on this endeavor? What > happened there? Most importantly, why is it all so secretive?
Did I miss a response to these questions? I'm interested to know the answer to at least two of them. micah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877hot58v2....@pond.riseup.net
