Hi! * Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> [2010-03-02 13:24:35 CET]: > On 02/03/10 at 12:10 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > And it's a vast difference between something that is exposed from the > > > start to begin with or something that is later adjusted to get exposed > > > like it wasn't intended to in the first place and thus isn't expected to > > > be. > > > > .... and without proper prior public discussion. > > Discussion is happening, less than 24h after the CGI was implemented.
After is not prior, that's one of the main points. > So, what do you propose? Roll back until a decision has happened would be a considerate step to take. > There has been the suggestion to send an email from the CGI. Would that > be acceptable for you? This still leaves the data stored in UDD, the CGI is only a minor part of the issue that uses the core point of troubles. Thanks, Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100302124646.ga3...@anguilla.debian.or.at
