On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 04:35:50AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Sourceless PDF files are not a violation of the Social Contract / DFSG. If > > you are having to sink time into finding source for such files, let's put an > > end to this - give me the details and I'll propose a GR that reaffirms > > what's stated already in our founding documents, that source code is only > > mandatory for programs. > Just to get this interesting: I've had packages rejected because of > included sourceless PDFs.
> Specifically, ttf-gfs-{-didot,-baskerville,-olga,-porson} on 04/04/2008.
> Upstream is including a font specimen with their original "tarball" =
> zipfile. I asked them for the specimen "source" (like that would do us
> any good, being in Adobe Illustrator format et al) but they refused, big
> surprise there.
What is the upstream zipfile in question?
<http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/GFS_DIDOT_TT.zip>, which seems to be the
right upstream zipfile, contains only the 6 files included in the
ttf-gfs-didot orig.tar.gz.
Is <http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/images/Didot%20Specimen.pdf> the file in
question? I certainly don't see that this would be a reason for a package
reject, but I also don't see any reason you would go out of your way to
package this if it's not already part of the upstream source.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
[email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
