On Mon, Aug 03 2009, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Aligning our releases with RHEL rather than with Ubuntu seems more
> worthwhile to me. They have similar stabilisation lengths as we did
> for previous releases and they're investing a lot of work into the
> kernel, from which we could profit immensely.
Now that's a thought. This would also help with SELinux, since
we would freeze with a tested and polished releawse-ready version of
SELinux userland and policies.
So, I would say that sync'ing with a peer distribution makes way
more sense than sync'ing with a Debian derivative.
manoj
--
Just because he's dead is no reason to lay off work.
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
