Le Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:16:35AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Le Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > > > I think it's clear from the copyright files already in the archive and > > that are accepted daily by ftpmaster that listing the individual files > > is unnecessary if you have all of the licenses accounted for (and > > potentially copyright notices, which are the main topic of current > > disagreement). I do agree with you that having that written down > > somewhere would be good, though. > > For the copyright notices, I propose to study the most common licenses > (typically, the ones who would get their abbriged name standardised in DEP5) > and make a table that summarises their requirements on that issue. That work > could take place on the debian-legal mailing list, for instance. > > With a good summary of the situation, I think that we will have more chances > to reach a consensus on this list or debian-devel, whithout generating too > much messages that would turn people out of the discussion.
Hi all, I started a documentation effort on debian-legal: http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20090701145728.gc16...@kunpuu.plessy.org Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org