On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:00:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 02:04:34AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > > > > Something is definitely wrong here, IMHO. > > > Maybe it's your assumption or assertion that the only point of NEW is > > checking the copyright file. > > He's right that binary NEW is not the right time to be applying unrelated > sourceful checks to packages. If ftpmaster feels the need to spot-check > packages, that's fine, but that shouldn't be coupled to package renames > where the purpose of NEW is to keep control of the package namespace and set > the archive overrides.
Well, one thing one might thing of: Auditing soname-changes. However, I guess the release-team would be the better group to evaluate those and I do not have an immediate idea on how to do this without causing major delays. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org