On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 08:22 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 05:48:33PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 01:04 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > > What you describe sounds like option 3, or maybe option 4. What is your > > > opinion on the fact that option 2 defeats both of them? > > > > I'm not sure I agree with your sense of distinction here. I think what > > I'm saying is a fair rationalization of picking any of 2-5 over 1. > > How is option 1 related to this?
Oh, sorry, perhaps I could have stated that part of my reasoning more explicitly. To my reading, option 1 was the only option that explicitly would have delayed Lenny release. All of options 2-6 favored release of Lenny, varying in how broad an exception should be granted and how that choice might be rationalized. Option 1 was the only choice voted below FD. All other options were considered acceptable outcomes by the voters. That's why I think the main outcome of this ballot was an assertion of desire by the voters that we release Lenny. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
