On 11622 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote:
> The goal of this GR is still unclear to me, and I would welcome a preamble
> that
> clearly explains what problem is being solved.
The goal is to change the needed seconds for a GR.
> For the moment I do not know if the problem is the multiplication of
> the amendments in the Lenny GR,
No.
> the fact that the lenny GR could even being started,
No, as the change of the requirements will *not* mean that such a GR
cant be started. Nor should it mean this.
> the fact that an override vote could be started to force a delegate to
> postpone his decisions,
Reread my proposal, I deliberately made that only need half the
seconds than normal GRs.
--
bye, Joerg
<aj> vorlon: would it be less subtle if we replaced red, green and
yellow with black, white and a shade of grey?
<vorlon> aj: "and this is what a necrotic port looks like"?
<aj> vorlon: the arch qualification table, halloween edition?
<aj> vorlon: "i heard a faint pinging, and went to the firewall and what
greeted my eyes? AN m68k RISED FROM THE GRAVE!!!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
