"Rafal Czlonka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Any employer selecting employees to hire is, by definition, > > discriminating based on particular criteria. If nothing else, they are > > (we hope!) discriminating based on demonstrated ability to perform the > > job functions. So we can't simply request job adverts avoid > > "discriminatory job offers". > > Abilities, knowledge, experience, etc. can be acquired;
Right. But just because an employer discriminates on the basis of any of these criteria doesn't stop it being discrimination. I repeat, employers *must* discriminate, usually based on some attributes of the employee. > age cannot. Indeed. So you've found at least one criterion that you would prefer to be absent from those used to discriminate. What I'm pointing out is that “discrimination” cannot be expected to not occur, because it's entirely essential to the process. Clearly what is being objected to is *not* the act of discrimination, but what particular *criteria* are used for discrimination. If you want to prevent *unfair* discrimination, you must first agree what specifically constitutes fair or unfair criteria; if you want to prevent *objectionable* criteria, you must first agree which specific criteria are objectionable. Good luck with that. -- \ “I moved into an all-electric house. I forgot and left the | `\ porch light on all day. When I got home the front door wouldn't | _o__) open.” —Steven Wright | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
