Raphael Hertzog wrote: > It works well except when the same package version is in two consecutive > release. > > 1.0-1+sarge1 > 1.0-1+etch1 when we really want the opposite. That's why > this scheme was invented. I agree that it's not very nice though but i > couldn't find anything "cleaner".
Should this be happening? If something warrants a stable update, it certainly warrants an upload to unstable (which hopefully won't use the +codename1 notation). -- Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
