On Monday 02 June 2008, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > > No, I don't, I agree with you that this would be unacceptable. > > > > Right, and that is where our opinions _do_ differ fundamentally. > > You don't agree that I agree with you?
OK, I misread that. Sorry. The fundamental thing we disagree on is that you think creating a patch and doing an immediate upload to DELAYED is an acceptable workflow for any kind of issue. I think that is unacceptable and I think I have made my arguments for that clear enough by now. It is acceptable and appropriate for _some_ cases, but IMO not even for "most". And there are also some situations - and I'd count almost any change to D-I team maintained packages in that - where it is *not* acceptable or appropriate in almost _all_ cases.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
