On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 01:35:49PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > pe, 2008-05-30 kello 11:42 +0200, Simon Josefsson kirjoitti: > > I believe it would lead to less problems to require that all DEPs are > > licensed under a liberal and widely compatible license, such as the > > Expat, X11 or the modified BSD license. > I agree that that would be more convenient. I don't know if there's
AOL > consensus that we should do it. However, if no-one objects within a > couple of weeks, I'll add a suggestion to use the Expat license in a > couple of weeks or so. Please go ahead, just a couple of suggestion: - please mention why Expat is being suggested, the scenario of packing DEPs together should be enough to convince the reader IMO - please mention the fact that Expat is kinda MIT/X11 with <add the feature I forgot here>, I feel the "Expat" name can sound weird to a lot of non -legal readers Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
