Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:18:30PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: > > * Making debian/copyright be machine parseable. > > * Agreeing upon a meta-package name or virtual package name. > > These sorts of issues are already tracked with the BTS, for instance when > they're dealt with by the tech-ctte or -policy.
Aside: where is "Making debian/copyright be machine parseable" in BTS? Where would it go? It's a good point that much of this could be done in the BTS, but maybe it's worth a DEP explaining how to map DEPs onto BTS. Or maybe it's perverting the BTS. I dunno. Sounds good though. Thanks, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
