On 23/10/07 at 11:10 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi, > > Take three, minor copyedit, plus the rule explicitly handling all-latent > teams. > > ----- > Proposed general resolution - Project infrastructure team procedures > > [..] > > * With regard to communication and documentation, infrastructure teams > should try to work under the guidelines laid out in > the Debian Developer's Reference.
What about dropping this, and renaming the GR to "Project infrastructure team membership procedures" ? This seems out of place. Apart from that, even if I disagreed at the start of the discussion, I'm now in favor of this GR: - it still feels like a lot of bureaucracy ; - but it only affects malfunctionning teams (for others, the DPL could even decide that they are not infrastructure teams!) ; - it might not solve the current problems with DSA, but it's worth trying. Thank you for your work on this. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
