Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:29:08PM +0200]: > > > Which teams do you currently have in mind? That applies to DSA, > > > obviously, ftp-master, but also well-functionning teams such as the > > > release team? > > > But it could also apply to every team that has a unix group, even if > > > it's used to maintain a very small part of Debian infrastructure. > > > > Yes. They should all have a mechanism to stop them from calcifying. > > I really don't think that the qa group, the webwml group, the list > admins, etc need such bureaucracy ... According to your definition, your > proposal apply to them too (they have a unix group, and have access to > resources in ways other than the standard practice).
I agree here with Lucas - You could even extend this (ok, by waiving the "unix group" requirement, which is implementation-specific and thus not exactly great for policy) to Alioth teams or whatnot. IMHO, "infrastructure teams" should be explicitly enumerated. -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
