Mike Hommey dixit: >> it's not. We could create a neutral.utf-8 locale for sure
Sounds like a plan. Maybe something short and uppercase, akin to "C" and "POSIX", how about "STD.UTF-8"? >> but a >> C.utf-8 is really bad, because some programs check the locale for 'C' >> and when they foind that use hand optimized functions to replace the >> localized libc ones. Ugh. Really? Nah, please spare me the details. >Note that you won't get strings split in the middle of a point code with >UTF-8. This is possible with UTF-8. Try this one: ł (U+0142) = C5 82 You can split between the C5 and the 82. >Anyways, maybe the general problem is that there should be a way to >generate locales at the user level (and store everything in ~/.locale, >for example) That'd be a nice additional idea, but it makes additional problems too, for example quotas, or when do these get updated, or that duplication is always bad. That would probably be a glibc issue then. //mirabile -- I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them. If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt
