On Fri, Jun 15, 2007, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > You make another point, which is interesting, but which actually when > carried to its logical conclusion ends up being in support of Range > Voting over Condorcet. If you continue with the logic asking what > happens when Range Voting voters vote strategically, you find that in > Range Voting where all voters are well informed of the opinions of the > electorate in general, and all voters cast optimal strategic ballots, > you get approval voting, which results in ... the winner being what > would have been the winner of a "100% honest" Condorcet election.
Unless you can tell us how to be well informed of the opinions of the Debian electorate in general, especially with ballots that go beyond yes/no questions, yet still want to make a point about the Debian voting system, you should not use that assumption in your reasoning. Regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
