On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:15:01PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: > On Tuesday 29 May 2007 11:58, Sven Luther wrote: > > You are wrong, you still need a impartial judge. Tell me where in debian > > i do find such ? That is the main problem, any argumentation is just > > lost time without a fair hearing and an impartial judge. > > > > If you can find an impartial judge which will not be dismissed by debian > > or blackmailed, then i will take the time to do so. > > Sven, > > You're making progress but there is still an error in your logic.
Is there ? > If you don't believe the judge you choose will ever under any > circumstances grant you the relief you desire, then you kick > yourself and get on with your life. You don't whine online. Nope, which is why i asked Wouter and Andreas Schuldei to be part of the mediation comittee. I believe that the judge in question should be unquestionly honest and fair, and recognized as such by either side. > If on the other hand you believe that there is a possibility > that the DPL or DAMs or DDs or your local municipal court judge > or the international criminal court in the Hague may rule in > your favor, then you put in the effort to properly prepare > your case using the same brain you use for your technical > work. You don't whine online. > > Under no circumstances is whining online a sensible policy. Erm, what about all those folks protesting in the street against this or that unjust handling, ? Is this not a sensible policy ? It is the only way open to the oppresed except armed revolution. > Go to it, and good luck. You still haven't commented on the original wiki page. Tell me what i should have done with it so it could have had more success than it did. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
