Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:00:25AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> Are you so overworked, or are you deliberately "forgetting"? It has >> been suggested multiple times in the past to use existing or new >> hardware and add it to the set of standard autobuilders. Many arches do >> not meet the redundancy requirement, > > Um, the only archs that don't meet the redundancy requirement today are i386 > and ia64.
It seems alpha didn't meet the requirement until a couple of weeks ago, too. And even if only two arches miss an autobuilder, it's still no reason for the DPL to pretend there's not problem. >> and we don't have autobuilders for i386 at all AFAIK. > > Incorrect. That's why I added "AFAIK". Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
