On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:19 +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > It didn't fulfil that condition: Etch didn't release on Mon 4 Dec 06 - > or is the next chunk of funding going to repairing the time machine > that was broken next week?
There's no need for a time machine to release on Mon 4 Dec 06. All what
you nee is a slow RM and enough time to wait for Monday 4th December
4006 ... ;-))
Regards
-- hgb
PS: IMHO that whole discussion (this thread) is going to get (or got
already) ridiculous, since the legal owner of any amount of money does
not have to share the reason, on why it was spent to two or more
individuals, with anybody else in the world ... or did anyone ask FSF
for the reason they paid Ian in the first year of debian (IIRC) ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
