On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:33:15PM +0000, Steve Kemp wrote: > > The suggestion wasn't to remove the addresses, but to "mask" them. > That would still allow you to lookup the sender addresses if you > wished. eg "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -> "foo at com.example". > > I'd strongly second the proposal myself, as well as updating some > of our other email-based-systems. For example listing emails in the > qa pages, in Debian changelog entries on packages.debian.org, etc. > Except that it ends up mangling things which are not email addresses and which legitimately need to have the @ symbol.
Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
