Anthony Towns wrote: > For the record, I haven't seen any such offers, and I've been looking > for them since May or so. (Proviso: offers should be accompanied by > some direct evidence that whoever's offering has the time and ability > to actually do stuff)
If at least any NEW queue package information was accessible, people could take an interest. If there's a problem with allowing access to the new packages themselves, cool, but there used to be at least some information on merkel.d.o's mirror of ftp.d.o (disabled for load problems for over a year[1]) and more, e.g. the .katie files if not also the whole .diff.gz and .changes - leave the orig.tar.gz and the .debs if these are problematic, could likely be made available for inspection at least for DDs. Letting people make suggestions for rejecting packages that they've found mistakes should be not very dangerous to the archive. Kind regards T. 1. I freely admit that I've not asked for it recently. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
