On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 23:47 -0400, Joe Smith wrote: > That is true. However this ammendment substancially changes the section > that talks about SPI, so it would be reasonable to have SPI's board look at > it if they so desire. > At best they could find some text that ought to be tweeked, and at worst > they could have no input.
What I'm missing in this "discussion" is that SPI has an active board at this very moment. No need to delay anything to satisfy both the "ask SPI" and "don't ask SPI" camps... the fact that their term ends soon is surely no reason to think they're suddenly incapable? Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
