On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:43:40PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:15:48PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:51:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:04:02PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > If you distribute binary images with a magazine and have something in > > > > that magazine saying "if you want the source write to <address> with a > > > > photocopy of this specific text", everything is okay. > > > > > > No more so than "if you want the source write to <address>, enclosing a > > > picture of you petting a cat". Unless, of course, you can show that "a > > > photocopy of this specific text" is a necessary cost of providing the > > > source. > > > > You're only required to provide the source to those who received a > > written promise from you or anyone who passed on the written promise. > > 3b) Accompany it with a written offer [...] to give any third party, for a > charge no more than your cost of physically performing source > distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding > source code > > Sorry, I just don't see how your interpretation comes out of that. Can you > elaborate further?
Err, heh. No, I can't :-) (I had always (subconsciously) read it that way, but now that you point it out, seems my interpretation was wrong. Thanks :-) -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
