Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20 Jun 2006, Adam McKenna spake thusly: > > If anyone can do d-i work, and everyone who does d-i work can have > > commit access, then Sven should have commit access. > > > But if not everyone who does d-i work has commit access (but > just files patches, or does NMU's), then we are off the hook?
No. As all can see, "has" is not the same as "can have". If there is a reason why a contributor cannot have access, it should be stated. I suspect this reason is "being Sven Luther" as Chris Waters suggests, so could be overcome with a psuedonym if wanted and I expect everyone will be *so* happy when that's uncovered(!) Regards, -- MJR/slef Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Bv sekvu http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
