People, please move this thread over to -project On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:13:37AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > >> [Benjamin Seidenberg] > >> > FYI: > >> > 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will > >> > clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i > >> > cant sleep (ie 1st -> 2nd june, 2-> 3) :) > >> > >> Sounds good, but do not really addresses the fundamental problem here, > >> which is that NEW processing at the moment is fragile and stops > >> completely when the single person handling NEW is busy elsewhere. > > > > There are two people, they are both on vacation. > > But then, isn't the time to choose people to fulfill positions when > key people is in vacation?
Only the ftp-assistants were on vacation, the ftp-masters were still around. I assume they evaluated the situation and decided it was not critical enough to warrant further steps. > IMHO, key people should always keep someone doing the job when going > out so the project don't slow down because of it. Our current, active, > ftpmaster are very receptive but this don't exclude the possibility of > them going to vacation together or at same time and the project slow > down a bit. Well, it seems their vacations are over now or very soon, so this point is moot. Personally, I don't think this issue is enough to revoke ftp-master's right to choose their staff among themselves, but rather push more people onto their team without their consent. Please follow-up on -project. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
