On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 12:34:54PM -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote: > But I think there's some value for people deciding on a license in > knowing which licenses clearly prevent a work from being included in > Debian and which do not.
I would think so, too. > So: if there's a public statement by Debian or debian-legal on a > license (like http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary is now), would > it be misleading for an organization to point to that statement? > Especially if it was clear that the review and approval was not an > endorsement of the organization or their goals? If there were an authoritative statement about any license, I don't see why that would be wrong. However, one thing that Debian is not good at, is providing authoritative statements about licenses. It would be great if you could find a way to change that somehow, but otherwise... -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
