On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:28:17AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 15 May 2006 06:18, Anthony Towns wrote: > > It means that if you wish to continue maintaining them, you need to do > > so independently of the Debian Install System Team, which is listed as > > the current maintainer, and of which you are no longer a member. If you > > wish to consult with your co-maintainers for those packages (Matt Kraai > > and Stephen R Marenka for nobootloader, and Cajus Pollmeier for > > partman-prep) and setup a new source control repository, that's > > entirely appropriate. > > [...] > > > You're no longer a member of the d-i team; if they wish to keep those > > packages' source in their subversion repository, it doesn't matter to > > you at all. If they wish to maintain a fork compared to your packages, > > that's fine too. If other members of the d-i team wish to maintain it > > in your stead, they probably will be expected to justify that change as > > a package hijack, depending on what your co-maintainers think of the > > situation. > > I actually do not agree with these statements for the reasons outlined in: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366938;msg=50
/me is awaiting with impatience the fix to partman-prep on PReP and IBM CHRP machines. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
