On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:16:14PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: >On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:47:22AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: >> [Wouter Verhelst] >> > Only if they're lucky enough to try to ask someone who has >> > NOIDPRIVMSG disabled. >> >> And as for Debian development, I receive even fewer private messages >> related to that. Do the rest of you? What aspects of Debian >> development warrant private conversations? I would think most things >> would be appropriate to discuss either in public or in small, focused >> channels. > >I get and send a lot of /msg in my debian releated work. for me this is >a reason to favour a move to oftc.
Ditto. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary." -- James D. Nicoll
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
