On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote: > I strongly disagree that 2.3 is a long-term thing. It should be > started years ago, but it isn't too late yet. We should push it with a > transition plan in mind (e.g: what we're going to do with the people > that is already waiting for DAM?), but the transition couldn't require > (more) work before applying, IMHO. We should block not really > interested people giving less privileges for those who do less as you > pointed out and be good with MIA and its procedures. I step in to help > writing a 1-year transition plan and contact the people that needs to > accept/reject some points, if you want.
I don't understand what you have written. Can you reformulate it ? A long term plan can happen shortly if someone does it, but the change mentionned in 2.3 involve many people and as thus will required a great deal of coordination work. That's why Mark called it "long term" IMO. But with Anthony's recent blog post, I'm sure we'll start going into this direction. http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2006/04/12#2006-04-11-maintainers Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
