On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Sven Luther wrote: > Nope, but i think those who try to hide the issue of non-free material in > main, by insisting that it is not software
Fonts or documentations are not softwares, for god's sake! > I want to remind you all, that previous to the two GRs which clarified the > meaning of what we must consider free .. what we must consider free *software* > For the rest of the stuff, just put it in non-free, and maybe modify how we > handle non-free, classifying it in non-free-but-distributable and > non-free-with-distributions-constraints, and making its use easy, especially > at the installer level for kernel firmware Good idea. I wish all users could install Debian on their exotic-firmware-enabled-network card and wifi-aware laptop (which is not the case currently) instead of saying "shit, this crap is just not working well. let's switch to gentoo or mandriva" But I still consider documentation different than softwares, and don't see any major problem regarding the FDL. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
