Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:53:26AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > In practice, it doesn't work out to mean the same thing, however. Most of >> > the packages in universe are maintained only by the Debian maintainer, and >> > propagated unmodified into Ubuntu. It is only when there is a specific >> > motive to change the package in Ubuntu that anyone on that team will touch >> > it. >> >> They are *not* maintained by the Debian maintainer, for the simple >> reason that the Debian maintainer does not have control over the >> contents of the package! > > Ok, now can you explain this inconsitency, you say in another mail that most > ubuntu packages are maintained by the debian maintainers.
Um, no, I don't recally saying in another email that ubuntu packages are maintained by the Debian maintainers. In fact, I've said the opposite. Are you confusing me with Matt? > Does this mean that those 'most' packages are maintained by the debian > maintainers, who do uploads to ubuntu also ? How many is most in this case ? > Do they also know about it ? I mean i was never proposed to make ubuntu > maintenance of my packages for example, so i wonder how this works. Um, I think you and I are in nearly complete agreement. Do you have me confused with someone else? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
